aleks
(Alex)
1
With JSON schema defined as such
{
"title": "test",
"properties": {
"_id": {
"bsonType": "objectId"
},
"aliases": {
"bsonType": "array",
"items": {
"bsonType": "string"
}
}
}
}
The generated graphQL schema is:
type Test {
_id: ObjectId
aliases: [String]
}
I would expect
type Test {
_id: ObjectId
aliases: [String!]
}
Am I missing something or is it a bug?
4 Likes
aleks
(Alex)
2
Any comments? Is it a bug or am I not seeing something here?
Interesting. Looks like a bug, as both are valid JSON:
e.g. this code is valid JSON:
"title": "test",
"properties": {
"_id": "12345",
"aliases": ["foo", "bar", "baz"]
}
}
And so is this:
{
"title": "test",
"properties": {
"_id": "12345",
"aliases": ["foo", null, "baz"]
}
}
And I tested this against https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/ to make sure both of these validated against the JSON schema you provided…
Hey @aleks, thanks for catching this - I work on the Realm team, and it is something we missed and are looking into resolving. Is this blocking you or your use-case at the moment?
An array with all strings should still be valid for both schemas which is the true intent of that type.
aleks
(Alex)
5
Hey @Sumedha_Mehta1!
No, it is not blocking me. It’s just messing a bit with my type checking, which is a bit of annoyance.
I assume that you are interested in getting notified of potential bugs ASAP, yet it took two weeks for a staff member to notice it. Do you have a way in which we (users) can reach out to you directly if we find some issues?
Hey @aleks - The forums are the best place to ask questions is the forum. Another place to provide feedback/improvement suggestions for the cloud side is in our feedback engine. We try to monitor both pretty closely the best we can Realm: Top (68 ideas) – MongoDB Feedback Engine
MongoDB support recommended me to file a request to fix this bug. Posting link to request here for anyone coming from search: Array types in generated GraphQL schema should follow JSON schema of a collection or custom type – MongoDB Feedback Engine
4 Likes
Hi, 3 years …
Nothing new about this bug ?? I have exactly the same issue with a very basic collection. The Query resolver for many items, just return [Type]! instead of [Type!]! How can we fix that ??? Thanks…